Alcampo.es

Case Study of a UX/UI Benchmarking and UI redesign project for the Alcampo.es website, focusing on improving visual communication and alignment with the updated brand guidelines.
Mockup Mockup

As part of the project, a benchmarking analysis was conducted, comparing Alcampo.es with four other leading online supermarket platforms. The study focused on identifying strengths and weaknesses across four key areas:

  • 1. Homepage – Overall structure, layout, and first impressions.
  • 2. Category Menu – Navigation, accessibility, and usability.
  • 3. Product Cards – Design, information hierarchy, and clarity.
  • 4. Product Page – Detailed information display and user interaction elements.

This analysis provided a clear understanding of industry standards and best practices, as well as opportunities for improvement specific to Alcampo.es.

Conclusions and Quick Wins!

The benchmarking study and analysis of Alcampo.es revealed several opportunities to improve the user experience and align the design more closely with user expectations and industry standards. Among these, two quick wins stood out for their potential impact:

  • Breadcrumb Navigation
    Implementing clear breadcrumb navigation ensures a well-defined user journey throughout the platform. This improvement offers the following benefits:

    · User Confidence: Helps users understand their location on the site, reducing uncertainty.

    · Error Reduction: Simplifies navigation, making it easier to backtrack or move between sections.

    · Transparency: Improves overall site usability by providing a clear visual path.

    BreadCrumb navigation
  • Button Color Adjustment
    Changing the red "Add to Cart" button to a more positive and accessible color creates a subtle yet impactful enhancement. Benefits include:

    · Positive Perception: Shifting to a friendlier color fosters a more welcoming interaction.

    · Consistency and Accessibility: Ensures the color aligns with the updated brand guidelines and is easier for all users to recognize, including those with visual impairments.

    Product Card

As part of the project, a benchmarking analysis was conducted, comparing Alcampo.es with four other leading online supermarket platforms. The study focused on identifying strengths and weaknesses across four key areas:

  • 1. Homepage – Overall structure, layout, and first impressions.
  • 2. Category Menu – Navigation, accessibility, and usability.
  • 3. Product Cards – Design, information hierarchy, and clarity.
  • 4. Product Page – Detailed information display and user interaction elements.

This analysis provided a clear understanding of industry standards and best practices, as well as opportunities for improvement specific to Alcampo.es.

Conclusions and Quick Wins!

The benchmarking study and analysis of Alcampo.es revealed several opportunities to improve the user experience and align the design more closely with user expectations and industry standards. Among these, two quick wins stood out for their potential impact:

  • Breadcrumb Navigation
    Implementing clear breadcrumb navigation ensures a well-defined user journey throughout the platform. This improvement offers the following benefits:

    · User Confidence: Helps users understand their location on the site, reducing uncertainty.

    · Error Reduction: Simplifies navigation, making it easier to backtrack or move between sections.

    · Transparency: Improves overall site usability by providing a clear visual path.

    BreadCrumb navigation
  • Button Color Adjustment
    Changing the red "Add to Cart" button to a more positive and accessible color creates a subtle yet impactful enhancement. Benefits include:

    · Positive Perception: Shifting to a friendlier color fosters a more welcoming interaction.

    · Consistency and Accessibility: Ensures the color aligns with the updated brand guidelines and is easier for all users to recognize, including those with visual impairments.

    Product Card
Design System

Current vs proposed page

Web before Web after
Design System

Current vs proposed page

Web before Web after